🔗 Share this article

Authorities have called it as among the biggest deceptions of its kind in the UK.

A total of 14 people have been convicted for their part in a multi-million pound scheme to defraud over 3,500 vacation property investors.

The targets were eager to exit long-standing timeshare contracts and sought out assistance.

The majority were aged between 60 and 80. In excess of 500 of them surrendered more than £10,000, and one handed over in excess of £80,000.

Those victimized were subjected to aggressive presentations lasting up to six hours. They were financially worse off, possessing valueless fake "points" and continued to be locked into expensive vacation property deals they could no longer use.

The Business Central to the Scam

The business at the heart of the scheme was the organization in question. They collected customers' funds to support the proprietors' opulent lifestyle of prestigious schooling, millionaire mansions and personal aircraft.

The individual at the helm of the organization, Mark Rowe, was sentenced to a seven-and-half year prison term in January for fraudulent conspiracy.

On Friday, his wife Nicola was part of the concluding cases to learn their fate.

She was handed a two-year long suspended jail sentence at the London court after admitting illegal fund handling.

This has been a extended wait and represents a major victory for the individuals who testified, the law enforcement and the Crown.

The Way the Inquiry Began

I first heard about the firm came in the summer of 2016. I was working in the research department of a media outlet, producing documentary programmes.

A acquaintance pointed out that his mum had assumed the rights of a timeshare apartment in the Spanish coast and, after years of holidays, had started seeking to exit the deal.

It should be noted how widespread holiday ownership had become with English tourists in the 1980s and 1990s.

Timeshares enabled people to occupy the equivalent unit annually, or trade their weeks with fellow investors who had apartments in alternative destinations. Roughly 600,000 sun-lovers seized that option.

The first timeshare rush was paired with a lot of stories about rip-off merchants fraudulently marketing investments. They appeared frequently on consumer shows.

The standard timeshare contract locked buyers for long periods.

In that period, those owners who had used their regular accommodation in the sun for decades were getting older, and many were looking to wave goodbye to their holiday properties.

Some had health issues and couldn't get to their apartments. Some just felt they'd enjoyed sufficient use from them. And some had died, in many cases leaving their family members to inherit the agreements - including their regular contributions and service charges.

The Undercover Operation Unfolds

It was at this point the friend's mum had found herself. She looked online for options and came across the organization, a enterprise whose digital platform assured to terminate her agreement.

But, having paid a fee and booked a meeting with them, her family became suspicious.

Additional investigation revealed hundreds of people saying they had handed over cash and got nothing out of it. In fact, they had suffered financially. Substantial amounts.

The investigative unit began investigating what was going on. It quickly became clear that there were questionable operators working within the vacation property industry.

An attorney had many grievance cases preparing to take action against the company.

We spoke to individuals who had used the firm and they each reported similar experiences. They believed the firm would buy their property away from them but when they attended a meeting (for which they submitted funds initially) they were told there was no potential buyers.

Rather, they were persuaded - actually compelled - to spend more money purchasing "Monster Rewards", associated with the business's umbrella group, the parent organization.

What exactly these were was not exactly clear. They seemed similar to a type of exchange medium, offering reduced-price holidays and amenities and consumer discounts.

And they were apparently "exchangeable with other owners, at a future date.

Committing funds at the time would produce an future return that would offset the firm's costs and allow the property owner with a gain, released finally from their burdensome agreement.

Too good to be true? Well, yes.

A 'Bait-and-Switch Scam'

Based on these descriptions were correct, this was a large-scale fraud.

The technique is termed a "bait-and-switch."

A business - specifically the company - "baits" the customer by advertising a particular product only to then claim it is unavailable, pushing the individual to an alternative, lesser offering.

This is against the law. Armed with all the evidence we had gathered, we made the case to secretly film one of the company's meetings.

The process requires dedication, work, and compelling reasons for why this is the only way to obtain the evidence necessary to demonstrate illegal activity.

With approval secured, our limited crew arranged a meeting with one of the organization's staff in the English town.

Posing as a potential client aiming to get his mum out of her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement